If you only read one thing this week…

Volcanos and human population by ifyouonlyreadonethingthisweek
May 31, 2006, 5:20 pm
Filed under: Articles, Environment, If you only have 15 mins

In the light of recent rumblings of Indonesia's Mount Merapi, it is sobering to think that 9% (455 million people) of the world's population live within 100 km of an historically active volcano. Who knew? Apparently, Christopher Small (Columbia University) and Terry Naumann (University of Alaska). In their 2002 paper, entitled Global Distribution of Human Population and Recent Volcanism, they say that "volcanoes tend to be population-magnets, which isn't news to volcanologists, of course. Soils around volcanoes are nutrient-rich, and are periodically resurfaced by recurrent eruptions and ashfalls". They go on to point out that "if a volcano is quiescent for anything approaching a generation, people tend to think that a catastrophic event probably won't happen to them".

The abstract is reproduced below, and you can click here for the full reference and accompanying graphs and maps. Have a look, and, if your program is situated on top of a potential volcano, it might be worth thinking about potential mitigation and preparedness measures. Global Distribution of Human Population and Recent Volcanism

Small, C and T. Naumann

Environmental Hazards, v.3, pp. 93-109, 2002
Active volcanoes have long been recognized for both their hazards and their benefits. The extent to which a volcano is considered hazardous (or beneficial) depends largely on its proximity to human population. Realistic estimates of the number of people at risk worldwide is necessary to systematically evaluate regional volcanic hazard and categorize individual volcanoes for potential human impact in the event of an eruption. This study quantifies the spatial relationship between global distributions of human population (in 1990) and recent volcanism. We estimate that 8.8% (455 million people) of the world's population lived within 100 km of an historically active volcano and 12% within 100 km of a volcano believed to have been active during the last 10,000 years (the Holocene Epoch). Of the 1410 Holocene volcanoes considered, we estimate that 457 volcanoes (222 historically active) had more than 1 million people living within a 100 km radius while 311 were relatively uninhabited with average population densities less than 1 person/sq.km. We also find that average population density generally decreases with distance from these volcanoes (within 200 km). The land around the 703 volcanoes with recorded historic eruptions had a median population density of 23 people/sq.km within 200 km as compared with the global median density of 4.3 people/sq.km for all occupied land area. Population density near volcanoes is not evenly distributed worldwide. The results of this study suggest that preferential population of volcanic regions may be influenced, in part, by climate. Volcanoes at high latitudes are generally uninhabited but at lower latitudes volcanic regions are often densely populated. In tropical areas, the elevation and fertile soils associated with volcanic regions can provide incentive for agrarian populations to settle close to potentially active volcanoes. In the tropical climates of AustralAsia, Africa and Central America, higher population densities occur in closer proximity to volcanoes. In more temperate climates, such as those of Japan and Chile, population density tends to increase with distance from volcanoes – in part ,because the climatic "advantage" of volcanic elevation is presumably less important in these regions.


Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: